W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > January 2000

Re: null alt-text, spacers, etc. etc.

From: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 10:24:38 -0500
Message-ID: <008e01bf5790$fb17c790$b040968e@ic.utoronto.ca>
To: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>, "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>
Wendy,

Thanks for the editing help on the ERT.

I noticed that you dumped the 'Example Language' section of the technique
and feel that it should be left in. This section can help to ensure that all
validation and repair tools inform the user in a consistent manner. It
doesn't force anybody to use the language but should be influential.

Chris


----- Original Message -----
From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
To: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2000 5:10 PM
Subject: null alt-text, spacers, etc. etc.


> hi all,
>
> i've posted my revision of technique 1.1.A at
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ert/tech1-1.html
>
> I started editing the rest of the techniques for checkpoint 1.1 but then
> decided to wait for reactions on this draft.
>
> note that i got rid of the "under discussion" section, and modified the
> structure a bit.  I like that the same structure is used for each
technique
> throughout the document, however it seems to be applied
> inconsistently.  applying a consistent structure would be one of the first
> things i think we ought to do in terms of general "clean up."
>
> --wendy
> --
> wendy a chisholm
> world wide web consortium
> web accessibility initiative
> madison, wi usa
> tel: +1 608 663 6346
> /--
Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2000 10:24:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:34 GMT