W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > January 2000

example language (was Re: null alt-text, spacers, etc. etc.)

From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2000 10:38:03 -0500
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20000105103652.00b5ef00@localhost>
To: "Chris Ridpath" <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>, <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Chris,

Yes,  I removed the example language because I felt it was redundant.  I 
thought that it was clear enough in the suggestions for repair.

What are other people's thoughts - add it back in?

--wendy

At 10:24 AM 1/5/00 , Chris Ridpath wrote:
>Wendy,
>
>Thanks for the editing help on the ERT.
>
>I noticed that you dumped the 'Example Language' section of the technique
>and feel that it should be left in. This section can help to ensure that all
>validation and repair tools inform the user in a consistent manner. It
>doesn't force anybody to use the language but should be influential.
>
>Chris
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
>To: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2000 5:10 PM
>Subject: null alt-text, spacers, etc. etc.
>
>
> > hi all,
> >
> > i've posted my revision of technique 1.1.A at
> > http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ert/tech1-1.html
> >
> > I started editing the rest of the techniques for checkpoint 1.1 but then
> > decided to wait for reactions on this draft.
> >
> > note that i got rid of the "under discussion" section, and modified the
> > structure a bit.  I like that the same structure is used for each
>technique
> > throughout the document, however it seems to be applied
> > inconsistently.  applying a consistent structure would be one of the first
> > things i think we ought to do in terms of general "clean up."
> >
> > --wendy
> > --
> > wendy a chisholm
> > world wide web consortium
> > web accessibility initiative
> > madison, wi usa
> > tel: +1 608 663 6346
> > /--

--
wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium
web accessibility initiative
madison, wi usa
tel: +1 608 663 6346
/--
Received on Wednesday, 5 January 2000 10:41:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:34 GMT