W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: the "badly written" wording -- Re: comments on beta accessibility page (was Re: Phrase with "from using the web" - Re: w3.beta Comments for discussion)

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:28:21 -0500
Message-ID: <1c8dbcaa0908311028leb1502exa9f2a75d7c0d1048@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
Cc: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hi All,

> Saying "websites that are not accessible create barriers that exclude..."
> kind of loses the point that it's bad.
>
> wording options:
> a. However, badly written websites and web tools create barriers that
> exclude...
> b. However, badly written websites and web tools that are not accessible
> create barriers that exclude...
> c. However, websites and web tools that are not accessible create barriers
> that exclude...
>
> Any other thoughts on this point?

The phrase " badly written" seem limiting. There can be more than bad
writing which can make a website not accessible.

Best Regards,
Laura

-- 
Laura L. Carlson
Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 17:32:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 31 August 2009 17:32:08 GMT