My vote is for c. However, websites and web tools that are not accessible create barriers that exclude... Otherwise if you go with a or b consider replacing "badly written" to something like "poorly coded" . Terry Morris Associate Professor, Harper College http://terrymorris.net On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> wrote: > catherine wrote: > ... > >> My only hesitation is with the "badly-written" part of the last sentence. >> I wonder if we really need it since we have "that are not accessible". Seems >> a bit redundant. Maybe just say : "However, Web sites and Web tools that are >> not accessible create barriers that exclude people from taking equal part." >> ? >> > > I'd like some more perspectives on this issue. I think Liam wanted to > specifically say that the web is designed to be accessible, and when > websites are done properly, they are accessible -- but when websites are > *badly* done, then they create barriers. (actually his suggestion: "badly > written web pages... re-introduce these barriers") > > Saying "websites that are not accessible create barriers that exclude..." > kind of loses the point that it's bad. > > wording options: > a. However, badly written websites and web tools create barriers that > exclude... > b. However, badly written websites and web tools that are not accessible > create barriers that exclude... > c. However, websites and web tools that are not accessible create barriers > that exclude... > > Any other thoughts on this point? > > ~shawn > > > > > > > -- Terry Morris Web Development & Design Foundations with XHTML htttp://www.webdevfoundations.netReceived on Monday, 31 August 2009 22:08:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 31 August 2009 22:08:55 GMT