- From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:36:26 -0600
- To: Yeliz Yesilada <yesilady@cs.man.ac.uk>, "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Yeliz Yesilada wrote: > Will WCAG 2.0 FAQ replace the WCAG 1.0 FAQ > <http://www.w3.org/1999/05/WCAG-REC-fact>? If not, I am wondering if it > would be useful to add a link from WCAG 2.0 FAQ to this page or may be > migrate some questions from 1.0 FAQ to this 2.0 FAQ (e.g., "How are > these guidelines related to the other WAI guidelines, and other WAI > work?")? Hi Yeliz, The current plan does not include updating <http://www.w3.org/1999/05/WCAG-REC-fact>. I'm not sure about linking to it -- we'd need to check the relevance of the information. Also, we got some feedback that it was too long, and also not really questions that people were frequently asking, but more a way to organize information that we wanted to share, which was a little off-putting. EOWG, what do you think? Right now we have the WCAG 2 FAQ at <http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/wcag2faq> We do have in the plan a general WAI/Web accessibility FAQ (although not near the top of the priority list). > "How are > these guidelines related to the other WAI guidelines, and other WAI work?")? I wonder if this is a higher-level question? (I more frequently get asked how WCAG relates to other guidelines such as U.S. Section 508.) What other questions do you think we ought to consider for <http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/wcag2faq>? Thanks, ~Shawn
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2008 23:37:23 UTC