W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2007

Question from WCAG WG about one of our comments

From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:07:45 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20070712100235.0260cfe0@localhost>
To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

EOWG:

We got a question back from the WCAG WG already about one of our new 
comments that we sent over to them on 29 June.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Jun/0408.html

We had said:

>21. [SC 3.1.4] We debated this but could not agree on a common 
>interpretation. Please clarify.

And they'd asked:

>Could you let us know what it was that you were debating about SC 3.1.4 
>for which you couldn't agree on a common interpretation?

And I'd replied:

>Well basically we didn't know what "a mechanism for finding" meant in "A 
>mechanism for finding the expanded form or meaning of abbreviations is 
>available," and we each came up w/ different theories -- however, looking 
>at "How to meet", this is explained, and apparently many different 
>mechanisms are possible.

So I've had some back & forth with them already, and I believe that our 
question may be addressed by what's in the "how to meet" guidance. But I'd 
like to briefly re-check our original intent with you in our upcoming 
teleconference this week.

Thanks,

- Judy


-- 
Judy Brewer    +1.617.258.9741    http://www.w3.org/WAI
Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
MIT/CSAIL Building 32-G526
32 Vassar Street
Cambridge, MA,  02139,  USA
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2007 14:08:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:44 GMT