- From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:23:01 -0400
- To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Dear EOWG Participants: I know we've put a lot of work into our comments on the recent WCAG 2.0 draft already, but there were two areas where we essentially submitted "placeholder" comments on 29 June. I'd like to bring these up once more in our discussion tomorrow, to see if we have more specific and constructive comments for WCAG WG in these areas (no new comments outside these areas though), or otherwise withdraw them and put the issues to rest. The two comments follow. Do you have any more thoughts on these? I've also linked to the relevant sections of the WCAG 2.0 draft. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#conformance-reqs >>6. [conformance requirements] EOWG may have further clarification >>questions for document editors, and/or suggestions for edits to this >>section, but does not have our editorial suggestions ready at this time. >>Our questions include whether there may be unnecessary redundancies in >>requirements 5 and 6, or whether any of that content might potentially >>belong in the guidelines themselves. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#conformance-referencing >>15. [intro to referencing section] EOWG may have further clarification >>questions for document editors, and/or suggestions for edits to this >>section, but does not have our specific editorial suggestions ready at >>this time. Regards, - Judy -- Judy Brewer +1.617.258.9741 http://www.w3.org/WAI Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) MIT/CSAIL Building 32-G526 32 Vassar Street Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2007 14:22:17 UTC