W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > April to June 2006

[regrets] Re: EOWG: WCAG 2.0 Review and Agenda for 19 May 2006 Teleconference

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:17:46 +0200
Message-ID: <446DB76A.2040703@w3.org>
To: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
Cc: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

regrets.


Judy Brewer wrote:
> 
> Dear EOWG Participants:
> 
> An agenda and calling logistics for our 19 May 2006 teleconference 
> follow, as well as links for document sections to review.
> 
> Time:     8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern Time. For other time zones see:
>           http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html
> Bridge:  +1.617.761.6200, code: EOWG# (3694#)
> IRC:     Channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665
> 
> Scribe:  Listed at http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html
> 
> Agenda:
> 
> We're continuing our review of the WCAG 2.0 Last Call Working Draft this 
> week, and focusing on the remaining sections. Please post comments to 
> the list in advance if possible -- thanks.
> 
> 1. Introduction to WCAG 2.0 [very brief check]
> * http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/intro.html
> Focusing on:
> - Does the introduction give a clear picture of what is in WCAG 2.0?
> - Are there any parts that might be confusing for readers?
> 
> 2. Comparison between WCAG 1.0 and 2.0 [very brief check]
> * http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/appendixD.html
> Focusing on:
> - Helpful? Clear?
> - Does it need any more context up front?
> 
> 3. Glossary [brief check]
> * http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/appendixA.html
> Focusing on:
> - Are the glossary entries clearer now, and helpful for understanding 
> the text?
> - Are any of the definitions unclear, or significantly conflicting with 
> other versions of WAI definitions for those terms?
> 
> 4. Guidelines [not so brief]
> * http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/guidelines.html
> Focusing on:
> - At the guideline level -- any substantial remaining understandability 
> problems?
> - At the success criteria level -- ditto?
> Note:
> - We probably will not have sufficient time to go through all of these,
>    but will select a few to highlight & discuss if needed;
>    people can follow up w/ posting more individual comments as needed.
> 
> 5. Comment wrap-up
> - reviewing and approving comments drafted to date
> 
> Regards,
> 
> ~ Judy & Shawn
> 
> ===
> 
> IRC reminders and tips:
> - IRC is supplemental to the call. Some participants do not have IRC. 
> All substantive comments should be said verbally in the call (not just 
> in IRC).
> - to type a side comment that will _not_ get recorded in the minutes, 
> type /me comment - e.g.:
> /me hopes everyone had pleasant holidays
> will come out:
> *shawn hopes everyone had pleasant holidays
> 
> Teleconference information:
> - Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes: 
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/template.html
> - W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge: http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
> - Zakim IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot
> - A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat): http://www.irchelp.org/
> 
> * Upcoming EOWG teleconference schedule: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings
> 
> ###
> 
> 

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | 
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | 
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ | 
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | 
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | 
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France | 
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 | 
Received on Friday, 19 May 2006 12:17:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:42 GMT