W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > April to June 2006

Regrets - Re: EOWG: WCAG 2.0 Review and Agenda for 19 May 2006 Teleconference

From: Justin Thorp <justin@mycapitalweb.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 08:20:50 -0400
Message-Id: <B238834E-06B7-4D84-8C11-D14F466E62BE@mycapitalweb.com>
To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

Regrets for today's meeting




On May 18, 2006, at 12:32 AM, Judy Brewer wrote:

>
> Dear EOWG Participants:
>
> An agenda and calling logistics for our 19 May 2006 teleconference  
> follow, as well as links for document sections to review.
>
> Time:     8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern Time. For other time zones  
> see:
>           http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html
> Bridge:  +1.617.761.6200, code: EOWG# (3694#)
> IRC:     Channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665
>
> Scribe:  Listed at http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html
>
> Agenda:
>
> We're continuing our review of the WCAG 2.0 Last Call Working Draft  
> this week, and focusing on the remaining sections. Please post  
> comments to the list in advance if possible -- thanks.
>
> 1. Introduction to WCAG 2.0 [very brief check]
> * http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/intro.html
> Focusing on:
> - Does the introduction give a clear picture of what is in WCAG 2.0?
> - Are there any parts that might be confusing for readers?
>
> 2. Comparison between WCAG 1.0 and 2.0 [very brief check]
> * http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/appendixD.html
> Focusing on:
> - Helpful? Clear?
> - Does it need any more context up front?
>
> 3. Glossary [brief check]
> * http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/appendixA.html
> Focusing on:
> - Are the glossary entries clearer now, and helpful for  
> understanding the text?
> - Are any of the definitions unclear, or significantly conflicting  
> with other versions of WAI definitions for those terms?
>
> 4. Guidelines [not so brief]
> * http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/guidelines.html
> Focusing on:
> - At the guideline level -- any substantial remaining  
> understandability problems?
> - At the success criteria level -- ditto?
> Note:
> - We probably will not have sufficient time to go through all of  
> these,
>    but will select a few to highlight & discuss if needed;
>    people can follow up w/ posting more individual comments as needed.
>
> 5. Comment wrap-up
> - reviewing and approving comments drafted to date
>
> Regards,
>
> ~ Judy & Shawn
>
> ===
>
> IRC reminders and tips:
> - IRC is supplemental to the call. Some participants do not have  
> IRC. All substantive comments should be said verbally in the call  
> (not just in IRC).
> - to type a side comment that will _not_ get recorded in the  
> minutes, type /me comment - e.g.:
> /me hopes everyone had pleasant holidays
> will come out:
> *shawn hopes everyone had pleasant holidays
>
> Teleconference information:
> - Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/ 
> 2003/template.html
> - W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge: http://www.w3.org/2002/01/ 
> UsingZakim
> - Zakim IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot
> - A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat): http:// 
> www.irchelp.org/
>
> * Upcoming EOWG teleconference schedule: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/ 
> #meetings
>
> ###
>
>
> -- 
> Judy Brewer    +1.617.258.9741    http://www.w3.org/WAI
> Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web  
> Consortium (W3C)
> MIT/CSAIL Building 32-G530
> 32 Vassar Street
> Cambridge, MA,  02139,  USA
>
Received on Friday, 19 May 2006 12:21:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:42 GMT