W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: Updated URL's on Jan's Test Site

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:12:25 +0200
Message-ID: <005e01c48685$100c2420$0200a8c0@iwars>
To: <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jan Richards" <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
To: "Tim Boland" <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Cc: <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 8:27 PM
Subject: Re: Updated URL's on Jan's Test Site


>I can possibly see combining the two categories of WCAG relative
>checkpoints (Web content and Web content-based authoring interfaces),
>but I'd like to see the ISO16071 relative category alone.

Yes. i agree too.

>Point 3 is quite tricky. I'd like to see something which asks people to
>refrain from making false claims. But who will ask them to withdraw a
>claim? The AUWG? A third-party reviewer? A competitor?

This is an old issue... until W3C don't create a "claim verification
service" (and who will pay for this) there is no possibility: I don't
think that W3C staff has also time to check, and go ahead wrong
expositions.
There could be a solution: make the buttons as ("tm"), so the incorrect
use is illegal use of trademark and W3C can request damage :)
Received on Friday, 20 August 2004 07:12:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:53:03 GMT