W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: Updated URL's on Jan's Test Site

From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:39:54 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
Cc: w3c-wai-au@w3.org

Good job overall!  I have a few questions on Guidelines link following:

(1) in section 3.2 guidelines "relative priority checkpoints" part, the 
text for
"web content checkpoints" and "authoring interface checkpoints" seems 
almost identical.
Can we simplify by combining these clauses, or do we anticipate that there 
will be significant
differences between them in the future?

(2) Under section 3.3.1 Claimants, point 3 seems to be covered under point 
2 (if claimants are responsible for..,
then they are expected to retract..etc.).   Furthermore, the last part of 
point 3 ("demonstrated
that" ..--by others?--), seems to contradict in a sense point 2 ("claimants 
are responsible for").   Should we drop point 3 (not needed)?

(3)  section 3.2 talks about "normative" success criteria.  Are there any 
other kind at this time?    Are there likely
to be non-normative success criteria in the future?

Thanks and best wishes,
Tim Boland NIST

   (At 09:10 PM 8/18/2004 -0400, you wrote:

>Hi everyone,
>After the changes to the conformance scheme were accepted on Monday I changed
>the URL's to the relevant pages back to what they had been:
>Sorry for any inconvenience!
>Jan Richards, User Interface Design Specialist
>Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto
>   Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca
>   Web:   http://jan.atrc.utoronto.ca
>   Phone: 416-946-7060
>   Fax:   416-971-2896
Received on Thursday, 19 August 2004 15:40:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:49 UTC