The wording in the most recent internal draft: http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2004/WD-ATAG20-20040120/#check-prefer-w3c is quite good. However, in the interest of clarity, I suggest the following re- wording: 2.2 Give priority to formats that enable the creation of WCAG-conformant content. [Priority 1] Rationale: Some formats are "WCAG-capable", enabling the creation of web content that conforms to WCAG, while other formats may intrinsically preclude this possibility. Giving priority to WCAG-capable formats will increase probability that they are used. Success Criteria: When format selection is automatic, the selected format must be WCAG-capable. When format selection is performed by the author, the most prominent format(s) must be WCAG-capable. (A format is WCAG-capable when a WCAG techniques document that explains how to meet each applicable WCAG checkpoint has been published and explicitly referenced.) -- Jan Richards, User Interface Design Specialist Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC), University of Toronto Email: jan.richards@utoronto.ca Phone: 416-946-7060 Fax: 416-971-2896Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2004 19:24:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:53:02 GMT