W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: Conformance Evaluation Page Ideas

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 10:44:32 -0400 (EDT)
To: Jan Richards <jan.richards@utoronto.ca>
cc: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0204101043430.14541-100000@tux.w3.org>
Yep, this looks good. I think a bit of tightening on the wording could
happen, but nothing really crucial.



On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Jan Richards wrote:

  Hi all,

  I have put together a prototype of how the conformance page might look.


  1. The disclaimer for the page is given more visibility.
  2. The process we were discussing yesterday on the call has been spelled
  out and placed at the end of the page.
  3. The process section includes a link to the conformance evaluation
  template that I sent out several months ago. I have updated the template
  with the review disclaimer and the required review information.
  4. As a space saving measure, only tools with evaluations have a row in
  the table. The others are placed in a single row at the bottom. I have
  only done this with markup editor category so far, but if people like
  it, I'll do the same with the other categories.

  Comments? Do the process steps cover all that we discussed yesterday?



  Jan Richards
  UI Design Specialist
  Adaptive Technology Resource Centre (ATRC)
  University of Toronto

  Phone: (416) 946-7060
  Fax: (416) 971-2896


Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI  fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Wednesday, 10 April 2002 10:44:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:47 UTC