W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > October to December 1999

Re: Priority of 7.1 (use conventions and standards)

From: Jutta Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 12:42:21 -0500
Message-Id: <v04011704b458961c7fdf@[142.150.64.191]>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, WAI AU Guidelines <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
I think it would further confuse, as 7.1 is relative to UA not WCAG, but I
agree it should not be listed as a P1, that gives the wrong impression.

Jutta

At 9:01 AM -0500 11/12/99, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>This is in the guidelines as a P1, with the relative priority description
>spelled out. I think that it should really be marked as relative priority
>(although I am not too concerned either way). The Pro is that the requirement
>is one that has relative priority, and the contr is thatrelative priority is
>defined in termsof WCAG. (In so far as WCAG is an applicable standard, it
>makes sense of course...)
>
>Charles McCN
>
>--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
>phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
>W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
>MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 1999 12:39:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:39:43 UTC