W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-au@w3.org > January to March 1999

Re: WD picky

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 19:17:31 -0500 (EST)
To: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
cc: "w3c-wai-au@w3.org" <w3c-wai-au@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9903051911450.8715-100000@tux.w3.org>
I agree that we should be referring to the checklist and not the
technniques. I think this came about because the checkpoints were at one
time called techniques. If this is the case and there are no objections I
will make the change in the next draft.

I don't think we need to put a copy of it directly into our document,
except perhaps in an expanded version of our document which included
techniques inline.

cheers

Charles

On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, William Loughborough wrote:

  In the techniques under 2.2 is the link to "Checkpoints for Web Content
  Accessibility Guidelines" which links to: 
  
  http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-WAI-PAGEAUTH/wai-pageauth-tech
  
  instead of to:
  
  http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-WAI-PAGEAUTH-19990226/full-checklist
  
  which is more appropriate.  In fact I think we should start immediate
  consideration of creating our own edited form of the latter for
  inclusion in our document.  The checkpoints document is central to our
  efforts (as well as those of EO) and it should be tailored to fit the
  explicit needs of other Working Groups.
  -- 
  Love.
              ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
  http://dicomp.pair.com
  

--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://purl.oclc.org/net/charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA
Received on Friday, 5 March 1999 19:17:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 September 2008 15:52:54 GMT