* Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> [2004-03-17 17:38-0600] > > >Do we have our first erratum? > > I think we should say that the 1988 reference is genuine, but not widely > known. How annoying. I just trawled back through old versions of the spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000327/ (CR of March 2000) has it. http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/PR-rdf-schema-19990303/ (PR of March 1999) didn't. Took 4 years for someone to spot the typo. Wonder what else will have surfaced by 2008... DanReceived on Wednesday, 17 March 2004 18:55:46 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 17 March 2004 18:55:48 EST