Re: semantics typos [was Re: Post-Herman changes to RDF semantics document]

pat hayes wrote:

snip
> 
> er...yes, its supposed to be unmatched, that's why its an illegal XML 
> literal.  So not a typo on that one. (Your reading it as one suggests 
> why its important to get all the real typos out, though.)
> 


Serves me right for not reading the example literally enough (as it 
were).  But maybe the example could be slightly more obvious, e.g. 
"<someTag>Hello, World<someTag"  [No, this is not a suggested change.]

--Frank