W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2004

Re: Heads up: RFC2996bis, possible problem for RDF

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:25:18 -0600
Message-Id: <p06001f1ebc5af6476cd1@[]>
To: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>At 17:08 19/02/04 +0000, Brian McBride wrote:
>>Graham Klyne wrote:
>>>I suggest we make an less-formal response for now (e.g. per [1]), 
>>>and if a problem remains when the draft goes to IETF last-call, we 
>>>may consider something more collective.
>>>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2004Feb/0061.html
>>That looks plausible to me.  Anyone unhappy?
>>Graham, does it help to have more folks chip in with "me too" 
>>messages at this stage?
>Probably not.  Better, I think, to debate the case coherently than 
>make it a political issue.  Having Jeremy and Pat supporting my 
>comments will, I think, be enough to show it's not an isolated 
>comment.  We're not at the stage of IETF last-call yet.
>On the other hand, if people have additional comments to make that 
>add substantially to the debate, that's always welcome.  (But please 
>bear in mind that this specification is in its final stages of being 
>nailed down, so any comments should be addressed specifically to the 
>specification rather than to broader issues, preferably with 
>suggestions for improvement.)
>If Pat agrees with the specific wording in [1] cited above (Jeremy 
>already has), then I'm ready to send it off.

Yes, go ahead.


IHMC	(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501			(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2004 18:25:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:09 UTC