W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2004

Re: Heads up: RFC2996bis, possible problem for RDF

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:25:18 -0600
Message-Id: <p06001f1ebc5af6476cd1@[10.0.100.76]>
To: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>At 17:08 19/02/04 +0000, Brian McBride wrote:
>>Graham Klyne wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>>I suggest we make an less-formal response for now (e.g. per [1]), 
>>>and if a problem remains when the draft goes to IETF last-call, we 
>>>may consider something more collective.
>>>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2004Feb/0061.html
>>
>>That looks plausible to me.  Anyone unhappy?
>>
>>Graham, does it help to have more folks chip in with "me too" 
>>messages at this stage?
>
>Probably not.  Better, I think, to debate the case coherently than 
>make it a political issue.  Having Jeremy and Pat supporting my 
>comments will, I think, be enough to show it's not an isolated 
>comment.  We're not at the stage of IETF last-call yet.
>
>On the other hand, if people have additional comments to make that 
>add substantially to the debate, that's always welcome.  (But please 
>bear in mind that this specification is in its final stages of being 
>nailed down, so any comments should be addressed specifically to the 
>specification rather than to broader issues, preferably with 
>suggestions for improvement.)
>
>If Pat agrees with the specific wording in [1] cited above (Jeremy 
>already has), then I'm ready to send it off.

Yes, go ahead.

pat


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC	(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501			(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2004 18:25:21 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thursday, 19 February 2004 18:25:24 EST