Re: rdfcore 2003-09-25 telecon agenda

Regrets for today's telecon. I have a family function this evening.

Patrick



On 2003-09-25 20:54, "ext Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> Time:
> 10:00:00 Fri Sep 25 2003 in America/New York duration 60 minutes +
> possible 15 minute extension
> 
> which is equivalent to
> 15:00:00 Fri Sep 25 2003 in Europe/London
> 
> Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
> irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore
> 
> danbri to chair.
> 
> 1: scribe 
> Graham volunteered
> 
> Please could the minutes conform to:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0216.html
> 
> 
> 
> 2: Roll Call
> 
> 
> 3: Review Agenda
> 
> 
> 4: Next telecon 26 Sep 2003 1000 Boston Time
> Chair?
> Volunteer Scribe
> 
> 
> 
> 5: Minutes of 19 Sep 2003 telecon
> 
> see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0213.html
> 
> 6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions
> 
> (this portion of agenda needs more work, sorry --danbri)
> 
> See current action list 2003-09-25,
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0232.html
> 
> --
> 
> 7: Confirm Status of Withdrawn Actions
> 
> 
> --
> 
> 8: Status of Misc Actions
> 
> 
> --
> 
> 
> 9: defusing semantics objections (lbase appendix)
> 
> Brian in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0242.html
> Two of Peter's objections concern the translation to LBase.  I'm
> wondering whether we might defuse these objections by replacing the
> LBase appendix with a suitably worded informative reference to the LBase
> note.
> 
> see also 'not accepteds' re semantics (pfps) summarised in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0241.html
> 
> Proposed: we do just this from danbri,
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0244.html
> 
> 
> 10: collecting objections
> 
> what exactly do we need to record w.r.t. known objections (esp I18N)
> prior to LC2? See
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0237.html
> and nearby.
> 
> 
> 11: next steps - planning for LC2
> 
> What needs to be done?
> 
> - couch in terms of refining a 'request to advance' doc
> (old draft http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030331-advance.html)
> and removing obstacles such that we're happy to send it.
> 
> What issues/comments do we need to respond to.
> Schedule? - update after SW CG discussion this week
> 
>

Received on Friday, 26 September 2003 06:49:04 UTC