W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2003

Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-09-05

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 11:58:31 +0100
Message-ID: <3F586C57.5000206@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
Cc: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

Dave Reynold's original comment:

PositiveEntailmentTest xmlsch-02/Manifest.rdf#whitespace-facet-3 - FAIL
   This tests bNode introduction - that a typed literal entails a graph
   with a bNode of type rdf:Literal. We have deliberately omitted the
   bNode introduction rules from the reasoner config on the grounds that
   this is not the way an RDF API should do it - users can query the
   nodes themselves for type information and creating virtual triples
   for this would be wrong from an API perspective.

** Failures - could fix:
NegativeEntailmentTest xmlsch-02/Manifest.rdf#whitespace-facet-2 - FAIL
NegativeEntailmentTest xmlsch-02/Manifest.rdf#whitespace-facet-1 - FAIL
   These test non-mutual entailment of a valid literal with an invalid
   literal that differs only by whitespace. Unfortunately our XSD
   handling library is happy with the whitespace and doesn't
   treat " 3 " as an invalid int.
   This could be fixed if that is indeed how XSD is supposed to work,
   though the current behaviour seems more useful in practice.

Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:

> Could someone please provide a pointer to the actual comment...
> Thanks,
> Patrick
Received on Friday, 5 September 2003 07:34:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:07 UTC