RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-09-05

Thanks.

Patrick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Jeremy Carroll [mailto:jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
> Sent: 05 September, 2003 13:59
> To: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere)
> Cc: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com; w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-09-05
> 
> 
> 
> Dave Reynold's original comment:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSe
> p/0076.html
> 
> [[
> PositiveEntailmentTest 
> xmlsch-02/Manifest.rdf#whitespace-facet-3 - FAIL
>    This tests bNode introduction - that a typed literal 
> entails a graph
>    with a bNode of type rdf:Literal. We have deliberately omitted the
>    bNode introduction rules from the reasoner config on the 
> grounds that
>    this is not the way an RDF API should do it - users can query the
>    nodes themselves for type information and creating virtual triples
>    for this would be wrong from an API perspective.
> 
> ** Failures - could fix:
> NegativeEntailmentTest 
> xmlsch-02/Manifest.rdf#whitespace-facet-2 - FAIL
> NegativeEntailmentTest 
> xmlsch-02/Manifest.rdf#whitespace-facet-1 - FAIL
>    These test non-mutual entailment of a valid literal with an invalid
>    literal that differs only by whitespace. Unfortunately our XSD
>    handling library is happy with the whitespace and doesn't
>    treat " 3 " as an invalid int.
>    This could be fixed if that is indeed how XSD is supposed to work,
>    though the current behaviour seems more useful in practice.
> ]]
> 
> Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:
> 
> > Could someone please provide a pointer to the actual comment...
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Patrick
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
>

Received on Friday, 5 September 2003 07:42:08 UTC