I'm just catching up on a backlog of things-to-do... this comment didn't make it as a formal LC comment, so I don't think it makes sense to invoke formal process for it. I don't plan to take any further action at this time, other than to try and prepare the ground for the MIME Content Type registration. #g -- At 15:38 12/11/03 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: >On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 06:05, Graham Klyne wrote: >[...] > > THEREFORE: > > I propose that we do not put the publication schedule and consensus > already > > developed at risk by trying to address Martin's editorial points in the > > short period available to us. > > > > Instead, I suggest that careful editorial work be undertaken for > > publication in an errata document, and subsequently in a revised > > publication of the Concepts document. > >Would you please phrase that proposal in the form of a draft >response to Martin? > >Then the chairs can judge whether it's consistent with >the proceedings of the WG and responsive to the comment. > > > >-- >Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#ContactReceived on Thursday, 20 November 2003 13:57:59 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thursday, 20 November 2003 13:58:03 EST