W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2003

Re: fragment identifiers

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:38:46 -0600
To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1068673126.13400.291.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 06:05, Graham Klyne wrote:
> I propose that we do not put the publication schedule and consensus already 
> developed at risk by trying to address Martin's editorial points in the 
> short period available to us.
> Instead, I suggest that careful editorial work be undertaken for 
> publication in an errata document, and subsequently in a revised 
> publication of the Concepts document.

Would you please phrase that proposal in the form of a draft
response to Martin?

Then the chairs can judge whether it's consistent with
the proceedings of the WG and responsive to the comment.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 16:38:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:08 UTC