On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 06:05, Graham Klyne wrote: [...] > THEREFORE: > I propose that we do not put the publication schedule and consensus already > developed at risk by trying to address Martin's editorial points in the > short period available to us. > > Instead, I suggest that careful editorial work be undertaken for > publication in an errata document, and subsequently in a revised > publication of the Concepts document. Would you please phrase that proposal in the form of a draft response to Martin? Then the chairs can judge whether it's consistent with the proceedings of the WG and responsive to the comment. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 16:38:52 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 12 November 2003 16:38:57 EST