W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2003

Re: URGENT: Request to advance to PR ready, Request process check, Ed's doc check

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 22:54:04 +0000 (GMT)
To: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0311142246320.8879@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Jos De_Roo wrote:

>
> JanG:
> > On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Brian McBride wrote:
> >
> >> EDs:  The request to advance contains status info about edits still in
> >> progress.  Please verify these are correct.  I think they are and will
> >> go ahead as soon I've verified the process, if I don't hear form you.
> >
> > Test cases, no further edits to do (to the best of my knowledge). That
> > is, all the outstanding actions and editorial stuff arising from LC2 is
> > done.
>
> If I'm not mistaken there's an error in the manifest
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-entailment/Manifest.rdf
> in that misses 2 s'es in following URI's
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-entailment/test001.nt
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-entailment/test002.nt
>                                                ^s
> The same for the overall manifest
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/Manifest.rdf
>
> Sorry that I haven't come up with that earlier
> but those are recently added tests and I wasn't
> able to run them before this evening (and I also
> had a lot of trouble to run them as they are
> about inconsistencies, but they now run (*))

Fixing now, thanks Jos.

-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
"Sufficiently large"="infinite" for sufficiently large values of "sufficiently"
Received on Friday, 14 November 2003 17:57:05 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Friday, 14 November 2003 17:57:08 EST