W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2003

Re: URGENT: Request to advance to PR ready, Request process check, Ed's doc check

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 23:19:13 +0100
To: "Jan Grant <Jan.Grant" <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OFF764A7DA.8A2F171A-ONC1256DDE.0078EFAD-C1256DDE.007A9C2C@agfa.be>


JanG:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Brian McBride wrote:
>
>> EDs:  The request to advance contains status info about edits still in
>> progress.  Please verify these are correct.  I think they are and will
>> go ahead as soon I've verified the process, if I don't hear form you.
>
> Test cases, no further edits to do (to the best of my knowledge). That
> is, all the outstanding actions and editorial stuff arising from LC2 is
> done.

If I'm not mistaken there's an error in the manifest
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfs-entailment/Manifest.rdf
in that misses 2 s'es in following URI's
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-entailment/test001.nt
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-entailment/test002.nt
                                               ^s
The same for the overall manifest
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/Manifest.rdf

Sorry that I haven't come up with that earlier
but those are recently added tests and I wasn't
able to run them before this evening (and I also
had a lot of trouble to run them as they are
about inconsistencies, but they now run (*))

--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

(*) http://www.agfa.com/w3c/temp/rdf-result.rdf
Received on Friday, 14 November 2003 17:19:24 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Friday, 14 November 2003 17:19:26 EST