> I think we could go in either of two directions: > > A: accept the comment > "worried that it may not be > obvious that the whitespace processing is not part of the process of > checking lexical forms for type validity," and add test cases to > demonstrate that whitespace is significant even inside typed literals of > types which in a XML Schema context would get processed away (such as the > integer examples) > > PROPOSE RDF Core accepts the comment xmlsch-02 and agree to add the following test case: <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.example.org/a"> <eg:prop rdf:datatype="&xsd;int">3</eg:prop> </rdf:Description> Does not entail <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.example.org/a"> <eg:prop rdf:datatype="&xsd;int"> 3 </eg:prop> </rdf:Description> Moreover the following comment to be added to concepts: [[ NOTE: In [XML Schema (part 1)], white space normalization occurs during validation according to the value of the whiteSpace facet. The lexical-to-value mapping used in RDF datatyping occurs after this, so that the whiteSpace facet has no effect in RDF datatyping. ]] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-1-20010502/#section-White-Space-Norm alization-during-ValidationReceived on Friday, 9 May 2003 06:23:20 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:29 EDT