W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > May 2003

RE: xmlsch-02 whitespace facet discussion

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 14:17:43 +0300
Message-ID: <A03E60B17132A84F9B4BB5EEDE57957B5FBBC4@trebe006.europe.nokia.com>
To: <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Jeremy Carroll [mailto:jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
> Sent: 09 May, 2003 13:23
> To: Jeremy Carroll; w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> Subject: RE: xmlsch-02 whitespace facet discussion
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > I think we could go in either of two directions:
> >
> > A: accept the comment
> > "worried that it may not be
> >     obvious that the whitespace processing is not part of 
> the process of
> >     checking lexical forms for type validity," and add test cases to
> > demonstrate that whitespace is significant even inside 
> typed literals of
> > types which in a XML Schema context would get processed 
> away (such as the
> > integer examples)
> >
> >
> 
> PROPOSE RDF Core accepts the comment xmlsch-02 and agree to add the
> following test case:
> 
> 
> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.example.org/a">
>    <eg:prop rdf:datatype="&xsd;int">3</eg:prop>
> </rdf:Description>
> 
> Does not entail

Does not RDF or RDFS entail, but *does* datatype entail, right?

> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.example.org/a">
>    <eg:prop rdf:datatype="&xsd;int"> 3 </eg:prop>
> </rdf:Description>
> 
> Moreover the following comment to be added to concepts:
> 
> [[
> NOTE: In [XML Schema (part 1)], white space normalization occurs
> during validation according to the value of the whiteSpace
> facet. The lexical-to-value mapping used in RDF datatyping
> occurs after this, so that the whiteSpace facet has no
> effect in RDF datatyping.
> ]]

Good.

Patrick
Received on Friday, 9 May 2003 07:17:47 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:29 EDT