- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 18:50:26 +0100
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Brian McBride wrote: > Great stuff Pat. I will upload the latest version so the WG page points > to it as the ed's working draft. > > Re issue closures: > > We closed horst-01 last week so thats done and you can send the > response, but you need to add a link to the decision. > > Regarding the others, since we don't have a telecon this week, is there > anything to be gained by asking the commentors whether they would accept > the proposed resolution in the meantime. If there are some minor tweaks > or discussion to be had, this could be done in the meantime. > > Brian With the pfps-0X issues, Pat is proposing to accept all of them, as addressed in the current editors draft. I suggest that this is sufficiently uncontroversial to do by e-mail, and I am prepared to second all the pfps-0X proposals. pfps-02, pfps-04, pfps-06, pfps-09 http://www.w3.org/2003/06/Process-20030618/policies.html#Consensus [[ Decisions MAY be made during meetings (face-to-face or distributed) as well as through email. ]] I am sure Peter would prefer to have WG decisions to review. The pan-01 and qu-03, since Pat is proposing to reject them, should, IMO, be dealt with in a telecon. Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2003 13:51:06 UTC