W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2003

Minutes: 24 Jan 2003

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 05:11:55 +0100
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200301280511.55196.jjc@hpl.hp.com>

(Editorial note:
  I took the liberty of rephrasing many actions to have the same format)

Executive Summary:
*** RDF went to Last Call. ***

ACTION jjc Send msg to I18N asking for relevant LC review 
ACTION bwm Send msg to XML Schema WG asking for relevant LC review 
ACTION bwm Send msg to uri@w3.org asking for relevant LC review 
ACTION em Send msg to  David of XMLP asking for relevant LC review 
ACTION danbri Send msg to  SVG asking for relevant LC review 
ACTION danbri Send msg to XHTML WG asking for relevant LC review 
ACTION danbri Send msg to RDF IG about LC
ACTION PatrickS Send msg to  UAProf asking for relevant LC review 
ACTION PatrickS Send msg to  Open EBook Forum asking for relevant LC review 
ACTION danbri remind RSS people to send their comments to www-rdf-comments
ACTION bwm send announcement to chairs list
ACTION jjc Send msg to XML C14N WG asking for relevant LC review 
ACTION bwm Send msg to RDF interest asking for relevant LC review 
ACTION bwm start draft request to advance to PR
ACTION em start drafting press release

IRC log (currently inaccessible):
  http://www.w3.org/2003/01/24-rdfcore-irc

1: Scribe 
Jan absent, Jeremy scribed.


2: Roll Call
Present: PatrickS (muted), DaveB?, Bwm, EMiller, SteveP, Manola, Jjc.
Jos, DanBri, DanC, MikeD
Regrets: Graham

3: Review Agenda
Items 7 and 8 moved to end of agenda (8 actually taken halfway thru 9).


4: Next telecon 31 Jan 2003
Scribe next week: Jos
Telecons now back to 60 minutes.


5: Minutes of 2002-12-13 telecon
APPROVED:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jan/0140.html


6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions


CONTINUED:
ACTION: 2003-01-10#13 daveB
add links to concepts in ntriples section of test cases doc


COMPLETED:
ACTION: 2003-01-10#11 janG
deprecate the mailto: base URI test case

ACTION: 2003-01-10#12 janG
fix rdfs:member, not rdfs:contains bug

ACTION: 2003-01-10#14 bwm
send out LC heads-up to targetted groups and individuals identified by Eric.

ACTION: 2003-01-17#1 frankM
send a brief note to PFPS indicating   the status of his primer comments.

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0065.html 

ACTION: 2003-01-17#2 bwm
check that it is clear that rdf:XMLLiteral is a URI or a datatype.

ACTION: 2003-01-17#3 janG
Update test cases zip file for w3 LCCWD, today

ACTION: 2003-01-17#4 danbri
propose words for semantics LC status section to note about further polishing 
needed - 1 sentence please.

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jan/0140.html

ACTION: 2003-01-17#5 danbri
copy the LBase RDF Schema tables from the latest version in rdf semantics into 
the LBase draft.



[[
7: Tech Plenary
at end
             


8: Publication of Last Call WD's
during 9
]]
 


9: Soliciting Last Call Reviews
2003-01-10#14 bwm send out LC heads-up to targetted groups and
                       individuals identified by Eric.

Email sent to P3P, XMLP, XML Schema, XLINK, URI, WAI.
Unclear who would do a P3P review, we may not get one.
Brian should not do that review.
ACTION jjc Send msg to I18N asking for relevant LC review 
ACTION bwm Send msg to XML Schema WG asking for relevant LC review 
ACTION bwm Send msg to uri@w3.org asking for relevant LC review 
ACTION em Send msg to  David of XMLP asking for relevant LC review 
ACTION danbri Send msg to  SVG asking for relevant LC review 
ACTION danbri Send msg to XHTML WG asking for relevant LC review 
ACTION danbri Send msg to RDF IG about LC
ACTION PatrickS Send msg to  UAProf asking for relevant LC review 
ACTION PatrickS Send msg to  Open EBook Forum asking for relevant LC review 

For all of the above actions please:
  cc: www-rdf-comments
and include specific pointers into the documents

     [[ Aside: Item 8.  Publication of Last Call WD's
        2003-01-17#6  ericM  publish the last call WDs and Lbase Note
        action complete
     ]]

(Scribe note item 9 appears to have been continued after item 10)

10: Handling last call comments.

Examplar suggested by DanC:
  http://www.w3.org/XML/2002/12/LC-xml-names11-doc

The chair suggested without opposition that:
            
We start with one public list for tracking last call comments, maintained by 
bwm, if we get too many comments we think again

One editor needs to take the lead on each comment; reflect it back in 
different words. Informational, or small typos do not go on to issue list at 
all. If we put [closed] in the subject line for such items then that helps 
some software.

9. (I think) yet more actions

ACTION danbri remind RSS people to send their comments to www-rdf-comments
ACTION bwm send announcement to chairs list
ACTION jjc Send msg to XML C14N WG asking for relevant LC review 
ACTION bwm Send msg to RDF interest asking for relevant LC review 

Discussion about Mike Dean's formal objection. If he gets a pointer out soon 
enough it will be included in announcement message.


11: PR Entry Criteria

Some discussion, 

DanC would like to see some integration of datatypes and real database
- integration points should be tested before PR

ACTION bwm start draft request to advance to PR
 ACTION em start drafting press release

7. TechPlenary
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/meetings/tech-200303/
RDF Core slot 6,7 march is now to discuss second phase of semweb activity

Some people would have difficulty attending without the WG meeting label. 
Topic taken offline.


12: FAQ: Relationship to XML Family of specs
Out of time.

13: XML Schema 1.1 Requirements
Out of time.
Received on Monday, 27 January 2003 23:11:03 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:55:24 EDT