Re: Semantics issues

Only dipping into this thread that I have not tracked.

>Which, looking forward, leads me to suggest that if Pat/Jeremy can agree 
>on an alternative treatment that gives clearer exposition of the intended 
>meaning, they should be allowed discretion to do so.

I would decline such discretion.

Given  earlier comments I had received against out former approach, I would 
need to check with both commentators (tbl and massimo) that they were happy 
with any back-tracking we did on XMLLiteral.

Jeremy