Re: Semantics issues

At 11:35 26/01/2003 +0000, Graham Klyne wrote:

[...]


>Which, looking forward, leads me to suggest that if Pat/Jeremy can agree 
>on an alternative treatment that gives clearer exposition of the intended 
>meaning, they should be allowed discretion to do so.

We are now in last call.  We need to have a more formal process for dealing 
with changes from now on.  I believe there are last call comments around 
this issue.   The WG must consider and agree a disposition of each 
comment.  Let's hope there are not too many for us to cope with.

Brian

Received on Monday, 27 January 2003 10:03:42 UTC