W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2003

Re: Syntax to PR?

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:50:25 +0000
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <23946.1043322625@hoth.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

>>>Jeremy Carroll said:
> (picking up on recent message in rdf-interest)
> Well, even before we have published the last call syntax spec we seem to 
> have had four compliant parsers announced!
> I suspose it would be rude to publish a proprosed rec before the beginning 
> of the last call period!


Of course this is encouraging, but I'm not sure how many of them both
accept all the positive parser tests and fail all the negative ones
(which is my idea of compliant re rdf/xml parsing).

But the state so far is looking promising.

It seems like a good idea to collect some pointers.  So far I've seen
announcements of conformance from:

  ARP [1/2]             Java, Jeremy Carroll
     -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2003Jan/0059.html

  Drive                 C#/.Net, Rahul Singh
     -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2003Jan/0132.html

  Raptor 0.9.7          C, Dave Beckett
     -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2002Dec/0106.html
     and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jan/0013.html

  rdflib 1.2.0          Python, Daniel Krech

  RDF API for PHP 0.3   PHP, Chris Bizer
     -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2003Jan/0062.html

  SWI-Prolog            Prolog, Jan Wielmaker
     -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2003Jan/0085.html
     and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0043.html

Which is great since the majority are by non WG members ;)

There are likely to be others I'm sure.

Received on Thursday, 23 January 2003 06:51:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:03 UTC