W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2003

Re: Wrong test-case: rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/test003

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:42:20 +0000
Message-ID: <3E22FA7C.5080206@hpl.hp.com>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

My copy of this test has the line
_:j88096 <http://example.org/prop1> :j88097 .

(with those numbers even)
I believe this to be correct.
I assume that this has been 'fixed' incorrectly since I got this copy.

Jeremy


Dave Beckett wrote:

> We just had a comment on this test case on the rdf comments list:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0043.html
> and this means an approved test case needs to be corrected to match
> the rdf/xml grammar.
> 
> This result:
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/test003.nt
> 
> needs the following change:
> 
> 15c15
> < _:j88096 <http://example.org/prop1> "" .
> ---
> 
>>_:j88096 <http://example.org/prop1> :j88097 .
>>
> 
> to match http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#emptyPropertyElt
> where when both rdf:ID and rdf:bagID are both present, the statement
> value is a blank node (the "Otherwise" clause) not an empty literal.
> 
> The good news:
> 
> [[P.s.	Using SWI-Prolog from the CVS snapshot it processes the rest of
> 	the test-suite properly now.]]
> 
> So that makes nearly 4 full implementations of the parser test cases
> (detailed evidence for this will have to be collected).
> 
> Dave
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 13 January 2003 12:42:33 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:55:19 EDT