Re: xmlsch-02

[...]

> I suggest we should consider whether he has a point.  Would it be
> possible to state that (or something like):
>
>    - the string part of a typed literal is not necessarily in the
> lexical  space of the datatype, but that the denotation of typed literal
> is determined by first applying the whitespace process designated for
> the datatype to get the lexical form and then applying the lex to value
> mapping.

(how did you call that, processing model? ;-))
That's fine for me.


--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/