W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2003

Re: Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization

From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 12:17:50 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030807121411.028a6e48@127.0.0.1>
To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Benja Fallenstein <b.fallenstein@gmx.de>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org, msm@w3.org

At 13:55 04/08/03 -0400, Martin Duerst wrote:
>Yes, in particular most C0 control characters, in XML 1.0.
>Most of that will be changed in XML 1.1. The NULL character
>(U+0000) still isn't legal XML 1.1, as far as I know.

I'm offline, so can't check, but I thought many (but not all) of the 
control characters not allowed in XML 1.0 remained so in 1.1.

See my message ...

X-Archived-At: 
http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20030725153840.02a5ce40@127.0.0.1

#g


------------
Graham Klyne          _________
GK@ninebynine.org  ___|_o_o_o_|_
                    \____________/
(nb Helva)       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   @Cliveden, River Thames
Received on Sunday, 10 August 2003 07:57:01 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:59:36 EDT