- From: Stephen Petschulat <spetschu@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:21:50 -0700
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Just the opposite, I think it is essential we continue to have non-typed
inline literals that are "interpreted" at the application level. I.e.
applications that currently use bare literals should continue to work as
expected and not require re-writing.
- steve
Stephen Petschulat
Brian McBride
<bwm@hplb.hpl.hp. To: Stephen Petschulat/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA
com> cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Subject: clarify "inline literals"
09/28/2002 08:24
AM
Steve,
On Friday's telecon, you stated as a requirement:
[["Inline" literals are required, don't care about model theory]]
What exactly did you mean here. I thought at the time you meant that we
get rid of non typed literals, but maybe you meant something else.
Brian
Received on Monday, 30 September 2002 11:22:32 UTC