Just the opposite, I think it is essential we continue to have non-typed inline literals that are "interpreted" at the application level. I.e. applications that currently use bare literals should continue to work as expected and not require re-writing. - steve Stephen Petschulat Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp. To: Stephen Petschulat/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA com> cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org> Subject: clarify "inline literals" 09/28/2002 08:24 AM Steve, On Friday's telecon, you stated as a requirement: [["Inline" literals are required, don't care about model theory]] What exactly did you mean here. I thought at the time you meant that we get rid of non typed literals, but maybe you meant something else. BrianReceived on Monday, 30 September 2002 11:22:32 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:51:05 EDT