W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2002

Re: Issue #rdf-containers-otherapproaches

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:33:02 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020919153047.022f1628@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

At 13:38 18/09/2002 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote:
>Brian,
>
>http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-containers-otherapproaches
>
>Since this issue was closed as "this issue is out of scope for this WG" I 
>note that we have since decided to include a list facility along the lines 
>suggested:
>
>http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-seq-representation
>
>Should first issue resolution be updated?

I've been thinking not.  We decided to include support for a 
daml:collection like list structure.  The question of alternative designs 
for contains is more general.  A future WG may consider this more general 
question and conclude that with parseType="Collection" no more is needed, 
or they may conclude otherwise.  That just seems like territory we have 
decided not to consider and in the interests of getting done I'm inclined 
to leave it that way.

Thoughts?

Brian
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2002 10:35:28 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:51:01 EDT