W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2002

RE: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 14:39:51 +0200
To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDKEBNCAAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com> 

> >From
> >
> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0104.html
> >
> ><rdf:Description>
> >   <eg:prop rdf:datatype="&xsd;deciaml">2.00</eg:prop>
> ></rdf:Description>
> >
> >is equal (i.e. syntactically)
> >
> ><rdf:Description>
> >   <eg:prop rdf:datatype="&xsd;deciaml">2.0</eg:prop>
> ></rdf:Description>
> >
> >
> >(We may first want to ask does the first entail [i.e. semantically] the
> >second, and/or vice versa).
>
> RDF entail?  RDFS entail?  Other entail?

Isomoprhic like an RDF/XML document and the corresponding N-triple document.
Hence, also all possible entailments.

Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 12 September 2002 08:41:52 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:50:59 EDT