W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2002

Re: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 13:11:35 +0300
Message-ID: <001b01c25a44$c6d3f210$864416ac@NOE.Nokia.com>
To: "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

OK. I assert that the two cases below are not syntactically
identical and that whether they are semantically identical
cannot be determined by the RDF MT alone but requires extra-RDF
knowledge about the datatype in question.

Patrick

[Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 50) 483 9453, patrick.stickler@nokia.com]


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>; "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>; <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Sent: 11 September, 2002 17:20
Subject: RE: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case


> 
> > Which one?
> 
> From
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0104.html
> 
> <rdf:Description>
>   <eg:prop rdf:datatype="&xsd;deciaml">2.00</eg:prop>
> </rdf:Description>
> 
> is equal (i.e. syntactically)
> 
> <rdf:Description>
>   <eg:prop rdf:datatype="&xsd;deciaml">2.0</eg:prop>
> </rdf:Description>
> 
> 
> (We may first want to ask does the first entail [i.e. semantically] the
> second, and/or vice versa).
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 12 September 2002 06:11:38 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:50:59 EDT