RE: Datatyping - abstract syntax - test case from Brian McBride on 2002-09-11 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from September 2002)

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 17:46:38 +0100
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020911174604.02a2ce90@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>

At 16:20 11/09/2002 +0200, Jeremy Carroll wrote:


> > Which one?
>
>From
>
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Sep/0104.html
>
><rdf:Description>
>   <eg:prop rdf:datatype="&xsd;deciaml">2.00</eg:prop>
></rdf:Description>
>
>is equal (i.e. syntactically)
>
><rdf:Description>
>   <eg:prop rdf:datatype="&xsd;deciaml">2.0</eg:prop>
></rdf:Description>
>
>
>(We may first want to ask does the first entail [i.e. semantically] the
>second, and/or vice versa).

RDF entail?  RDFS entail?  Other entail?

Brian

Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2002 12:48:54 UTC