Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:20:11 +0200
Message-ID: <012201c2953d$c8c061b0$4b9316ac@NOE.Nokia.com>
To: "ext Jan Grant" <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: "ext Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
[Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, patrick.stickler@nokia.com] > XML Schema/datatypes document is absolutely clear on this - > ... > So neither type is a subClassOf the other; but many of their values > coincide. Well... even some of the XML Schema folk weren't too sure... but I suspect the majority of folks would agree with your interpretation. I think it would be a very useful point of clarification to have an RDF Schema that would take into account Jeremy's extended hierarchy (attached), but again, that's outside our scope... Patrick
