W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Minutes: telecon 2002-11-22

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:46:46 +0000 (GMT)
To: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0211251206130.12073-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

Agenda:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0538.html

Transcript:
	http://www.w3.org/2002/11/22-rdfcore-irc

Scribe:
	This week jang (daveb assisted)
	Next week, jjc.

Roll call:
   Dave Beckett
   Dan Brickley
   Jeremy Carroll
   Dan Connolly
   Jos De Roo
   Jan Grant (scribe)
   Pat Hayes
   Frank Manola
   Brian McBride (chair)
   Eric Miller
   Steve Petschulat
   Patrick Stickler
   Aaron Swartz

Regrets:
   Mike Dean, Graham Klyne

Review agenda:
   No AOB.

Next telecon:
   Most WG members will be available, so the next telecon is
   scheduled for 10am Boston time, 29 November.

Minutes of last telecon:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0438.html
APPROVED.

Confirm status of completed actions:
ALL DONE.


Item 7: Test cases.
   [the rest of the telecon was devoted to the datatype test cases]
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0447.html

  The datatype test case discussion was long and involved (see
  transcript). Outcomes:

Pending editorial changes and small fixes, the test cases were approved,
barring the cross-datatype entailment (although general feeling was
that it also held). A decision on that was held back pending further email
discussion.

ACTION 2002-11-22#1 (jang) ensure test cases themselves are named using
	frag IDs (see jjc's OWL test cases)

ACTION 2002-11-22#2 (jang) [test case fix] remove RDFS entailment rules
	from the language-ignored-for-numeric-types cases.

ACTION 2002-11-22#3 (path, jjc) Tie MT datatype to the sec that points
	out language isn't important to DT entailment
	thatexcept for rdf:XMLLiteral

ACTION 2002-11-22#4 (jjc) create an example.org DT-entailment
	showing that language is not relevant.

ACTION 2002-11-22#5 (jjc) check that RDF Concepts does not allow a
	synonym for rdf:XMLLiteral

ACTION 2002-11-22#6 (danc) review RDF Semantics, with a particular view
	to "define a language, not a software spec"

ACTION 2002-11-22#7 (jang) DT test case: range clashing with DT
	specification

There was discussion as to whether our current treatment of the
interaction of datatyped literals and language could be improved.

ACTION 2002-11-22#8 (jjc) Liase with I18N people on whether they're
	happy with the DT/language setup as it is.



-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
Strive to live every day as though it was last Wednesday.
Received on Monday, 25 November 2002 10:50:17 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:10 EDT