W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: More on XSD in RDF

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 25 Nov 2002 10:15:25 -0600
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, ext Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1038240926.5319.25.camel@dirk>

On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 09:42, Brian McBride wrote:
[...]
>    o I suggest:
> 
>    - we use non controversial examples of schema datatypes in our test 
> cases - stay away from the stuff that tests understanding of schema 
> datatypes more than rdf

As I explained earlier, I disagree with shying away from
contraversial issues that are relevant to our design, i.e.
keeping them out of the test suite.

If we're shy about these issues, let's get them out of
our design; c.f. rdfs:format
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Oct/0031.html

>    - we propose through the coordination group the writing of note jointly 
> by folks from rdfcore and xml schema datatypes which defines the RDF schema 
> for XML Schema datatypes.
> 
>    - that we write that note after last call and before proposed rec
> 
> Comments?
> 
> Brian
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 25 November 2002 11:16:30 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:10 EDT