- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 14:47:41 -0500 (EST)
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, <fmanola@attbi.com>
On 8 Nov 2002, Dan Connolly wrote: > > > rdf:object rdfs:range rdfs:Resource . * > > > > ...did we agree that all literals are resources? > > regardless, it's redundant to say range Resource. > Please let's don't. If there were some er... 'things' that aren't resources (eg. literals), then this wouldn't be redundant. I've lost track of our decisions on that front, hence the prev. msg. Dan
Received on Friday, 8 November 2002 14:47:46 UTC