W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 08 Nov 2002 13:45:15 -0600
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Cc: "Peter F. "Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, fmanola@attbi.com
Message-Id: <1036784716.19693.12706.camel@dirk>


On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 13:40, Dan Brickley wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > rdf:object	rdfs:range  rdfs:Resource .		*
> 
> ...did we agree that all literals are resources?

regardless, it's redundant to say range Resource.
Please let's don't.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Friday, 8 November 2002 14:44:47 EST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Brian McBride: "Re: RDFS todo: is rdfs:member a rdfs:ContainerMembershipProperty?"
Previous message: Dan Brickley: "Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms"
In reply to: Dan Brickley: "Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms"
Next in thread: Dan Brickley: "Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms"
Reply: Dan Brickley: "Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms"
Reply: pat hayes: "Re: missing (and incorrect) RDFS axioms"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:01 EDT