W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: Quick reviews of new abstract syntax?

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:54:15 +0100
To: jjc@hpl.hp.com
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF65F8CD8A.17982CED-ONC1256C68.004C0E2A-C1256C68.004C69B7@agfa.be>


> Anyone up to doing a very quick review of the modified abstract syntax
...
>
>
http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/RDF-concepts/2002-11-05/rdf-concepts.html


re: #section-Graph-syntax
one comment I have is on
  The subject may not be an RDF literal.

for a plain literal maybe OK, but a typed literal
can be a perfect subject
e.g.
  "10"^^xsd:int xsd:int "10".

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2002 08:55:36 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:53:58 EDT