W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: Quick reviews of new abstract syntax?

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 18:23:39 -0600
Message-Id: <p05111b0fb9ee110eb152@[65.217.30.130]>
To: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>  > Anyone up to doing a very quick review of the modified abstract syntax
>...
>>
>>
>http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/RDF-concepts/2002-11-05/rdf-concepts.html
>
>
>re: #section-Graph-syntax
>one comment I have is on
>   The subject may not be an RDF literal.
>
>for a plain literal maybe OK, but a typed literal
>can be a perfect subject

Not in my version. Literals are not subjects, and that includes all 
forms of literals. Subjects are urirefs or bnodes, and that is all.

Pat

>e.g.
>   "10"^^xsd:int xsd:int "10".

syntax error: subject:  "'10"^^xsd:int' is not a legal uriref.

Pat

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2002 19:23:24 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:53:59 EDT