- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:15:51 +0000
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
>>>Jan Grant said: > On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Beckett wrote: > > I think resolving > > base URI "mailto:Jeremy_Carroll@hp.com" > > with URI "relfile" > > will give > > URI "mailto:relfile" > > not > > URI "mailto:/refile" > > > > because mailto is a non-hierachical URI scheme (does not start > > mailto:/ so can be detected by apps). > > Isn't there a canonical answer for this in the definition of the mailto: > prefix? If not, this needs flagging up for TAG or appropriate body to > find an answer to (even if it's "undefined") and the resolution of this > changed to match. The mailto URL scheme ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2368.txt Does not mention how relative URIs are handled, however it remains a non-hierarchical URI scheme (everything after the : is opaque) and the above resolution I think is correct. Dave
Received on Friday, 22 March 2002 06:19:06 UTC