W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-03-15

From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:49:24 GMT
Message-ID: <6744085.1016131679315.JavaMail.bwm@MCBRIDE-B-4>
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Time:
10:00:00 Fri Mar 15 2002 in America/New York

which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Mar 15 2002 in Europe/London

Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.openprojects.net #rdfcore

1: Allocate scribe


2: Roll Call


3: Welcome guest Mark Butler


4: Review Agenda


5: Next telecon 10am Boston time, 29 Mar 2002


6: Review Minutes of 2002-03-08 telecon

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0125.html


7: Confirm Status of Completed Actions

ACTION: 2001-09-28#12 Jeremy Carroll
Separate out the character encoding issues from language ones in the literal [parseType=Literal] Proposal

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Sep/0341.html

ACTION: 2002-02-25#1 Jeremy
Formalize test case for <eg:prop rdf:ID="issue" eg:p1="foo" />

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0013.html

ACTION: 2002-02-25#6 jjc
generate more test cases for rdfms-nested-bagID

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0014.html

ACTION: 2002-02-25#15 DanC
Confirm with RDF 2396 that xml:base="http://example.org"> decision is correct

see:
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f/irclog-2002-02-26.html

ACTION: 2002-02-25#16 jjc
replace xml:base error cases 1 and 2 with +ve test cases

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0162.html

ACTION: 2002-02-26#5 jjc
Produce proposal for use of canonicalization for parseType literals

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0197.html

ACTION: 2002-02-26#8 PatrickS
Create XML examples for datatypes doc

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0129.html

ACTION: 2002-02-26#9 FrankM
Primer WD ready for review by 8th Mar

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0154.html

ACTION: 2002-03-08#1 bwm
Suggest dates 17,18th June by e-mail.

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0193.html

ACTION: 2002-03-08#2  FrankM
Put first Primer WD in front of WG early next week

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0154.html

ACTION: 2002-03-08#3 DaveB
Propose an updated ntriple format for literal

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0092.html

ACTION: 2002-03-08#4  jjc
Produce XSLT test case which fails to copy namespace declarations.

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0159.html

ACTION: 2002-03-08#5  DaveB
review xml:base positive cases

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0083.html

ACTION: 2002-03-08#6 jjc
Convert xml:base -ve to +ve cases on Monday

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0162.html

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0167.html



8: June F2F meeting
The June F2F meeting will be held in Bristol on 17th and 18th June 2002.


9: Status of Primer WD
Propose approve primer WD for publication.

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0154.html


10: Open E-Book Forum


11: XML Base Test Cases
Propose approve these test cases, as modified by:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0162.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0167.html

and close this issue.


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/att-0516/01-xmlbase.zip
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0162.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0167.html


12: Issue rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr
Review test cases at:

  http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/



See:
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr
  http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr/


13: Issue rdfms-nested-bagID
Review test cases at:

  http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/


See:
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-nested-bagID
  http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/


14: Updated n-triples notation for literals

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0092.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0182.html


15: Datatypes

Issues with the current proposal:
    * The lack of XML examples (Patrick Stickler to provide)- done
    * Jeremy's entailment is a problem
    * Octal is not an XML Schema datatype
    * XML Schema datatypes do not support different language representations

Proposed Issues:
  Its too complex; the doublet idiom was not completely removed.  Section 5 of

  http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/simpledatatype23-02-2002.html

  is redundant.

  Patrick: do you have another issue?


See:
  http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/simpledatatype23-02-2002.html
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f/#d-2002-02-26-3
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0130.html


16: Contexts and Quoting
Pat has asked for some telecon time to explain some ideas.



17: Issue rdfms-xml-literal-namespaces
The basic idea is that a parser will add namespace declarations to the top level element of a parseType=Literal, for those namespace prefixes used in the literal which are visible (i.e. used in element or attribute names).  Namespace prefixes used only in attribute values or element content will be ignored.

The exact string produced by a parser is undefined.  However, the strings produced by any two conformant parsers, when canonicalized, are equal.

Propose the WG resolves:

  o  the exact form of the string value corresponding to any given XML Literal
within RDF/XML is implementation dependent.

  o the string value is well-balanced XML

  o taking the exclusive canonicalization of both the original XML Literal in its containing document, and the string value of the literal produce the same character string.  This will be used as the basis for test cases.

  o the canonicalization above is without comments

  o this issue is closed

  o to raise a comment on the XQuery/XPath 2.0 data model that it does not adequately address the handling of namespace prefixes appearing in attribute values.


See:
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-xml-literal-namespaces


18: Internationalization
Awaiting Jeremy's updated proposal.



19: IRI's
Where are we.  Do we have test cases?




------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2002 13:49:45 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:46:18 EDT