W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-)

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 09:04:53 +0200
To: ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B8B4C6B5.10899%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
On 2002-03-12 16:44, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:

> At 15:58 12/03/2002 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote:
>> On 2002-03-12 15:01, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
>> The point I am trying to make here is that with the
>> present treatment of datatype URI's denoting only the
>> value space rather than the entire datatype,
> 
> In the present model theory, datatype URI's denote the
> datatype.  
>
> The class extension of the datatype is the value
> space. 

Hmmm...

So, when used with rdfs:drange, the URI denotes the complete
datatype but when used with rdfs:range and rdfs:domain,
the URI denotes only the value space of the datatype?

So, the URI denotes different things in different contexts?

I consider that to be a bug.

Patrick

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2002 02:40:01 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:46:17 EDT